UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7429
JAMES FORBES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
L. THOMPSON, Doctor; NURSE EPPERSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CA-96-818-2)
Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 24, 1998
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Forbes, Appellant Pro Se. David Ernest Boelzner, WRIGHT,
ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-
cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Forbes
v. Thompson, No. CA-96-818-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 1997). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-
quately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2