UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7393
QUINCY D. BYRD, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
G. HILL, Superintendent; S. D. VOGEL, M.D.; H.
OZINAL, M.D.; B. ROSS, Nurse; A. CRAMER, M.D.;
V. SMITH, RNCB; V. SMITH, Chief Physician/OHS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CA-96-1747-AM)
Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 24, 1998
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Quincy D. Byrd, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Alan Douglas Titus, CARR,
GOODSON, LEE & WARNER, P.C., Washington, D.C.; Rosalie Vaughan
Pemberton, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, P.C., Staunton,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and
deny Appellee Hill's motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R.
App. P. 3(c). Byrd v. Hill, No. CA-96-1747-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 8,
1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2