UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6467
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERT PETER RUSSELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-91-56-A)
Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 10, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Peter Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Robert Peter Russell appeals the district court's order deny-
ing his cross-motion for relief from judgment and granting the
Government's motion to set aside the order to preserve evidence. We
have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Russell, No. CR-91-56-A (E.D. Va.
Feb. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
United States v. Russell
Combined Opinion