In Re: Stith v.

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2763 In Re: SALVAGE DELACY STITH, Debtor. _________________________ SALVAGE DELACY STITH, Debtor - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Creditor - Appellee, and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE; FRANK J. SANTORO, Parties in Interest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-97-786, BK-96-20183) Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: June 18, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Salvage Delacy Stith, Appellant Pro Se. Gary Dexter Gray, Charles Foster Marshall, III, Beverly Moses Katz, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Gregory David Stefan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s dismissal without prejudice of Appellant’s Chap- ter 13 plan for cause under 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In re: Stith, Nos. CA-97-786; BK-96-20183 (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2