UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1542
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND
BENEFIT OF VIRGINIA MIDLAND, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SALLY E. GREENHOUSE; TROY A. TITUS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
GCI, INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-95-965-A)
Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: June 23, 1998
Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raighne Coleman Delaney, MURRAY & JACOBS, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellant. James Robert Hart, John Lee Daugherty, DIXON, SMITH &
STAHL, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee; Troy A. Titus, Appellee Pro
Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing its
civil action under the Miller Act and order denying its motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af-
firm on the reasoning of the district court. United States ex rel.
Virginia Midland, Inc. v. Greenhouse, No. CA-95-965-A (E.D. Va.
Feb. 20 & Mar. 15, 1996). We deny Appellant’s “motion for aid and
direction” and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2