Armstrong v. Corcoran

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6182 JOHN ARMSTRONG; ROBERT D. BIGGS; STERLING YOUNGCOURT; KENNY EDMONDS; RONALD JOSEPH GOVOSTIS; JEFFREY RITTER; MICHAEL SILBERMAN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; LEHRMAN DOTSON, Assistant Warden; PARKER, Hearing Officer; ROBERT KOPPEL, Captain; LOGAN CHANNEY, Cap- tain, all defendants are sued in the individ- ual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1541-AW) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Armstrong, Robert D. Biggs, Sterling Youngcourt, Kenny Edmonds, Ronald Joseph Govostis, Jeffrey Ritter, Michael Silberman, Appellants Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Gloria Selena Wilson-Shelton, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court’s orders denying relief on their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Armstrong v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-1541-AW (D. Md. Dec. 11, 1997, and Jan. 8, 1998). We deny the motion for appoint- ment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2