UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7728
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROY STEVE DAVIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-89-407-A, CA-97-448-AM)
Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 14, 1998
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy Steve Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Louis Cardani,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Appellant’s “Motion for
Consideration” of his informal brief, deny a certificate of appeal-
ability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Davis, Nos. CR-89-407-A; CA-97-448-AM (E.D.
Va. Apr. 9 and Sept. 17, 1997). Because the claims were not
presented in the district court, we deny Appellant’s motion to
supplement the record. We deny Appellant’s motions for appointment
of counsel and for oral argument because the facts and legal con-
tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2