UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2378
MARGIE J. THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CA-95-3240-1-6-BD)
Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 28, 1998
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam
opinion.
Margie J. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Laura H. Walter, GLASS,
MCCULLOUGH, SHERRILL & HARROLD, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
In this employment discrimination action, Appellant appeals
from the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation and granting summary judgment to Defendants. In her
appeal, Appellant raises certain claims that were not preserved in
her objections to the magistrate judge’s report. See Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985) (failure to object waives appellate re-
view); see also Howard v. Secretary of HHS, 932 F.2d 505, 508-09
(6th Cir. 1991) (failure to file specific objections, as opposed to
general and conclusory ones, waives appeal). Accordingly, we dis-
miss the appeal on all grounds other than that the district court
erred in looking at company-wide treatment of employees, rather
than treatment of employees under the supervision of Appellant’s
supervisor, in determining that Appellant had failed to present a
prima facie case of discrimination. On this issue, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Thomas v. Westinghouse Savannah
River Co., No. CA-95-3240-1-6-BD (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 1997). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
2