UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6744
ARMANDO DESPAIGNE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PHOEBE JOHNSON, Warden of Perry Correctional
Institution; CHARLES CONDON, Attorney General
of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-97-3410-13AK-6)
Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 27, 1998
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Armando Despaigne, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28
U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) petition. Appellant’s case
was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief
be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objec-
tions to the report and recommendation could waive appellate review
of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite
this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge’s
recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate
judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of
the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been
warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See
Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). Appellant
has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after
receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
DISMISSED
2