Filed: August 24, 1998
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1385
(CA-97-3986-6-13AK)
Donald J. Strable,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
Charles B. Simmons, Jr., etc.,
Defendant - Appellee.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed August 5, 1998, as follows:
On page 2, line 1 of text: "Charles B. Simmons, Jr., ap-
peals ...." is corrected to read "Donald J. Strable appeals ...."
On page 2, line 7 of text -- "We deny Simmons’ motion ...." is
corrected to read "We deny Strable’s motion ...."
For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1385
DONALD J. STRABLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES B. SIMMONS, JR., Judge, Master-in-
Equity,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-97-3986-6-13AK)
Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998
Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald J. Strable, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald J. Strable appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Strable v. Simmons, No. CA-97-3986-6-13AK (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 1998).
We deny Strable’s motion for sanctions and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3