UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6771
ROY BENJAMIN SALLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DR. BLAND, Medical Doctor at Perry Correction-
al Institution,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-97-3071-2-18AJ)
Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: September 8, 1998
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy Benjamin Salley, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt,
BURNS, MCDONALD, BRADFORD, PATRICK & TINSLEY, Greenwood, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. Appellant’s case was referred to a
magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The
magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Ap-
pellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommenda-
tion could waive appellate review of a district court order based
upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to
object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.
The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s
recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the
substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned
that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v.
Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas
v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review
by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.
Accordingly, we grant Appellee’s motion to dismiss and dismiss the
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2