Grisso v. Apfel, Commissioner

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1791 BILLY GRISSO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-98- 1061-AMD) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: September 8, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Billy Grisso, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Billy Grisso appeals the district court’s order dismissing his mandamus petition which sought to compel the Defendant to render a decision on his application for benefits filed under 42 U.S.C. § 402(x)(1) (1988) (current version at 42 U.S.C.A. § 402(x)(1) (West Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Grisso v. Apfel, No. CA-98-1061-AMD (D. Md. Apr. 20, 1998). We also deny Grisso’s motion to remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2