United States v. Horton

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6087 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIE HORTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CR-89-180-A, CA-93-439-AM) Submitted: August 31, 1998 Decided: October 7, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Franklin West, Jr., RICHARDS, MCGETTIGAN, REILLY & WEST, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Debra Sue Straus, Assistant United States Attorney, David Glenn Barger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Horton, Nos. CR-89-180-A; CA-93-439-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 31, 1995; Nov. 25, 1997) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2