UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6758
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM OSCAR ROYSTER, a/k/a W. O.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
(CR-94-26-F, CA-97-287-5-F)
Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sheryl Gordon McCloud, Seattle, Washington, for Appellant. Robert
Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
William Oscar Royster appeals the district court’s order deny-
ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.
1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
and find no reversible error. McCloud did not demonstrate that the
trial judge’s absence from the bench during the Government’s
closing argument was prejudicial. See United States v. Love, 134
F.3d 595, 604-05 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 66
U.S.L.W. 3790 (U.S. June 15, 1998) (No. 97-9085). Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Royster, Nos. CR-94-26-F; CA-97-287-5-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 1998).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2