Davis v. Thomas

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6679 LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. L. THOMAS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BHAND; COR- RECTIONAL OFFICER GEE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SINGLETON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JACKSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-97-297-AM) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Lawrence Davis, Jr. appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint for failure to timely pay a partial filing fee. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Thomas, No. CA-97-297-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2