UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7041
GEORGE WILSON, III,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
M. E. RAY, FCI, Estill, South Carolina; US
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, for the District of South
Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior
District Judge; Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-
97-632-2-OAJ)
Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: October 19, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Wilson, III, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his mo-
tion for reconsideration filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the court’s denial of
reconsideration. Wilson v. Ray, No. CA-97-632-2-OAJ (D.S.C. June
10, 1998). We grant Appellant’s motion for leave to file a reply
brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2