UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7055
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JUSTO ENRIQUE JAY,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 98-7215
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JUSTO ENRIQUE JAY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-88-20-C, CR-88-21, CA-97-202-P)
Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 27, 1998
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William F.W. Massengale, MASSENGALE & OZER, Chapel Hill, North
Carolina; John Kenneth Zwerling, ZWERLING & KEMLER, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellant. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
his motions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) and 28 U.S.C.
§ 1651 (1994) and the district court’s order denying Appellant’s
motion to issue a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Jay, Nos. CR-88-20-C; CR-88-21; CA-97-202-P (W.D.N.C. May
12 & July 21, 1998). We therefore dismiss Appellant’s appeal of the
district court’s order denying his motion to issue a certificate of
appealability as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
3