UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6597
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES M. DEBARDELEBEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CR-84-43-B, CA-97-1131-B)
Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: November 16, 1998
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James M. DeBardeleben, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James M. DeBardeleben seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders denying his motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) of the court’s order denying relief on his
motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), his
motion to disqualify the judge, and his motion for decision. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. DeBardeleben, Nos. CR-84-43-B; CA-97-1131-B
(D. Md. Sept. 4, 1997; Mar. 12, 1998). DeBardeleben’s motion “for
decision by unbiased judge due to Clerk Connor’s harassment” is
denied as baseless, and his motions “to disqualify Circuit Judges
Russell, Phillips, and Murnaghan” and “for decision on motion to
waive 50 page brief limit” are denied as moot. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
United States v. DeBardeleben
Combined Opinion