Rogers v. Montgomery Cnty MD

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2281 REID R. ROGERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, CIRCUIT COURT; FREDERICK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND; INVESTIGA- TIVE COUNSEL; COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISABILI- TIES; JAMES DOBSON, Doctor; RUSH LIMBAUGH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-2599-WMN) Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 16, 1998 Before ERVIN, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reid R. Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Reid R. Rogers appeals the district court’s order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rogers v. Montgomery County, No. CA-98-2599-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 19, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2