UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7119
NATHANIEL JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RANDOLPH COUNTY CORRECTION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CA-97-1202-1)
Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Herre Erwin, Assistant
Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have re-
viewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Johnson v. Randolph County Correction, No. CA-97-1202-1, (M.D.N.C.
July 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Johnson v. Randolph Cnty Correc
Combined Opinion