In re: Lukacs v.

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2537 In Re: FRANK PAUL LUKACS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-96-2913-PJM) Submitted: November 17, 1998 Decided: November 30, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank Paul Lukacs, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Frank Paul Lukacs filed a petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that this court order the district court to: (1) vacate its orders in two of Lukacs’ pending civil cases prohibiting the parties from filing further pleadings or motions until the court is able to dispose of motions currently pending; and (2) permit Lukacs to file further pleading, motions, affidavits, and appeals. In this mandamus petition, Lukacs failed to establish that he has a clear right to the relief sought and that no other remedy is adequate. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus may not be used as a substitute for ap- peal. See In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). We therefore grant Lukacs’ motion to file an attachment to his petition and deny Lukacs' petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2