UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7100
WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ARCHIE C. GEE, Warden; ASSISTANT WARDEN
SPANGLER; PATUXENT STAFF; DEPARTMENT OF COR-
RECTIONS; EMSA STAFF; MARYLAND HEALTH AND
HYGIENE DEPARTMENT OF MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
98-975-DKC)
Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
William Allen Legg filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dis-
miss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices
of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are
“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of
Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.
Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have
thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of
appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The
only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court
extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens
the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).
The district court entered its order on April 15, 1998; Legg’s
notice of appeal was filed on July 23, 1998, which is beyond the
thirty-day period. Legg’s failure to note a timely appeal or obtain
an extension of the appeal period leaves this court without juris-
diction to consider the merits of his appeal. We therefore dismiss
the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2