UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1098
MICHAEL A. SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION; DAVID R. GOODE;
STEPHEN CRAIG TOBIAS; JON L. MANETTA; DONALD
W. MAYBERRY; WILLIAM E. HONEYCUTT; LEWIS D.
HALE; TIMOTHY A. HEILIG; C. D. VITTUR; D. D.
GRAAB; A. L. LUTTRELL; JERRY R. GRAY; W. F.
HENLEY; J. E. PAIR,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
J. W. CLEMMER; LANDMARK COMMUNICATIONS,
INCORPORATED,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-97-522-2)
Submitted: December 22, 1998 Decided: January 15, 1999
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael A. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. David Nash Payne, KAUFMAN &
CANOLES, Norfolk, Virginia; Samuel Johnson Webster, Heather Ann
Mullen, WILLIAMS, KELLY & GREER, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Michael Scott appeals from district court orders denying him
relief in his civil action in which he asserted various claims re-
lated to alleged post-employment discrimination. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's orders and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Scott v. Norfolk Southern Corp., No. CA-97-522-2 (E.D. Va.
Dec. 18, 1997, July 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2