UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7207
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DWIGHT SHAFFER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CR-92-299, CA-98-550-2)
Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 12, 1999
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwight Shaffer, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Dwight Shaffer appeals an order of the district court denying
a motion for sentence reduction based on Shaffer’s post-sentence
rehabilitation efforts. We affirm. Under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)
(West 1985 & Supp. 1998), and Fed. R. Crim. P. 35, the court may
not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed except
in very narrow circumstances not applicable here. United States v.
Fraley, 988 F.2d 4, 6 (4th Cir. 1993). The cases cited by Shaffer
to support his argument that post-sentencing rehabilitation efforts
can be considered under the sentencing guidelines involve situ-
ations where an initial sentence has been reversed on other grounds
and the offender is to be resentenced, United States v. Sally, 116
F.3d 76 (3d Cir. 1997); or post-offense but presentence rehabil-
itation efforts. United States v. Brock, 108 F.3d 31 (4th Cir.
1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2