UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2409
BARTON J. ADAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; STATE OF WEST
VIRGINIA, Board of Osteopathy; ROBERT FOSTER,
individually and in his capacity as President/
Member of the Board of Osteopathy; RODENY
FINK, D.O., individually and in his capacity
as Vice President/Member of the Board of
Osteopathy; JOSEPH E. SCHREIBER, D.O., indi-
vidually in his capacity as a Secretary/Member
of the Board of Osteopathy; KAY CHERENKO, in-
dividually and in her capacity as a member of
the Board of Osteopathy; BEA HARVEY, individ-
ually and in his capacity as a President/
Member of the Board of Osteopathy; PAUL
KLEMAN, individually and in his capacity as a
President/Member of the Board of Osteopathy,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DOES 1-100, individuals; DOE ENTITIES 1-100,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CA-96-200-5)
Submitted: January 5, 1999 Decided: January 20, 1999
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barton J. Adams, Appellant Pro Se. James J.A. Mulhall, SHUMAN,
ANNAND, BAILEY, WYANT & EARLES, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
complaint with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Adams v.
State of West Virginia, No. CA-96-200-5 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 19, 1998).
Accordingly, we deny Appellees’ motions to supplement the record
and to strike Appellant’s reply brief as moot. We also deny Appel-
lant’s request for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3