UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7678
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 98-7679
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 98-7746
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 99-6035
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. Elizabeth V. Hallanan,
Senior District Judge. (CR-88-112)
Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Arnold Young, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Arnold Young appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for reduction of sentence, motion for reconsideration,
and motion for appointment of counsel and motion for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. We note
also that Young was not entitled to relief under the version of
Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 which was applicable to offenses committed
prior to November 1, 1987. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See United States v. Young, No. CR-88-112
(S.D.W. Va. Sept. 25, Oct. 29, Nov. 12, & Dec. 16, 1998). We deny
Young’s renewed motion for appointment of counsel and motion for
leave to proceed IFP. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3