Wooding v. Henry

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7564 RON WOODING, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MARK HENRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-1643-JFM) Submitted: March 31, 1999 Decided: April 27, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ron Wooding, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, George Levi Russell, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Ron Wooding appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wooding v. Henry, No. CA-98-1643-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 21, 1998).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The district court relied on this court’s decision in Pelissero v. Thompson, 155 F.3d 470 (4th Cir. 1998). That opinion has been withdrawn and a new opinion has been issued. Pelissero v. Thompson, ___ F.3d ___, No. 97-6156 (4th Cir. Mar. 12, 1999). Pelissero still controls the result in this case, however, and dictates the same outcome. 2