UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2538
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ALL EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND DEVICES, USED AND
INTENDED TO BE USED IN MAKING COUNTERFEIT
SECURITIES AND COUNTERFEIT FEDERAL RESERVE
NOTES, INCLUDING ONE COMPAQ 150I MONITOR, ONE
COMPAQ PRESARIO 7180 HARD DRIVE, TWO COMPAQ
SPEAKERS, ONE SISCO SHREDDER, ONE UMAX
SCANNER, ONE POWERSTRIP, ONE COMPAQ KEYBOARD,
ONE EPSON STYLUS COLOR PRINTER, MISCELLANEOUS
COMPUTER CABLES, ONE PREMIER PAPER CUTTER,
TWENTY-THREE COMPUTER DISCS, AND ONE BOX OF
INK JET PAPER,
Defendant,
EDWARD THOMAS ILLSLEY,
Claimant - Appellant,
and
GAILYA J. ILLSLEY,
Claimant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-98-54-3)
Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Thomas Illsley, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Edward Thomas Illsley appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for the Government in this forfeiture
action brought under 18 U.S.C. § 492 (1994). We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. All Equipment, Materials and Devices,
No. CA-98-54-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2