UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
QUANG HONG NGUYEN,
Petitioner,
v.
No. 99-1297
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION
SERVICE,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order
of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
(A25-065-356)
Submitted: June 17, 1999
Decided: June 29, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and
BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
_________________________________________________________________
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
_________________________________________________________________
COUNSEL
Quang Hong Nguyen, Petitioner Pro Se. David Michael McConnell,
James Arthur Hunolt, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUS-
TICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Nguyen appeals the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration court's order of
removal. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (Service) has
moved to dismiss Nguyen's appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Nguyen is a native and citizen of Vietnam who was admitted to the
United States as a refugee in 1980 and was granted permanent resi-
dent status. Nguyen was convicted in 1984 of unlawful wounding. He
was sentenced to five years' imprisonment. In 1987, Nguyen was con-
victed of robbery and use of a firearm in the commission of a felony.
He was sentenced to consecutive terms of eight years' imprisonment
for the robbery offense and four years' imprisonment for the firearm
offense. On August 7, 1997, the Service issued Nguyen a Notice to
Appear for removal proceedings, and after a removal hearing, Nguyen
was determined to be subject to removal on the grounds that he had
been convicted of (1) a crime involving moral turpitude; (2) two
crimes involving moral turpitude not arising from a single transaction;
(3) an aggravated felony; and (4) a firearm conviction. See Immigra-
tion and Nationality Act (INA) §§ 237(a)(2)(A)(i), (ii), (iii) and
(a)(2)(C), 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1227(a)(2)(A)(i),(ii), (iii) and (a)(2)(C)
(West 1999). On appeal, the Board upheld that decision, finding
Nguyen is ineligible for asylum or other relief because of his convic-
tions for two aggravated felonies for which he was sentenced to a
term of imprisonment of at least five years. See INA §§ 208(b)(2),
241(b)(3)(B), 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1158(b)(2), 1231(b)(3)(B) (West 1999).
The Board's order was entered on November 2, 1998. Nguyen filed
his petition for review on March 9, 1999.
Nguyen's notice to appear for removal proceedings was filed on
August 7, 1997. Therefore, the permanent provisions of the Illegal
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996
(IIRIRA), Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009 (1996) apply to this
case. Because Nguyen is an alien who committed an offense that ren-
ders him deportable under INA §§ 237(a)(2)(A)(ii), (iii) and
(a)(2)(C), IIRIRA divests this Court of jurisdiction over his appeal.
See INA § 242(a)(2)(C), 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252(a)(2)(C) (West 1999).
2
Furthermore, Nguyen's petition for review is untimely. See INA
§ 242(b)(1), 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252(b)(1) (West 1999). We therefore grant
the Service's motion to dismiss this appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3