Jafari v. City of Richmond

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2686 EMMETT JOHNSON JAFARI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CITY OF RICHMOND, Municipal Corporation; ROBERT C. BOBB, Individually, and in his Offi- cial Capacity as City Manager; JERRY JOHNSON, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as Deputy City Manager; JOHN A. RUPP, Individ- ually, and in his Official Capacity as City Attorney; L. CHESTER BRAZZELL, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as Director of Personnel; JEFFREY WOODSON, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Facilities; L. ANGEL JONES, Individually, and in her Official Capacity as Deputy Director of Parks, Recrea- tion, and Community Facilities, Defendants - Appellees. No. 99-1211 EMMETT JOHNSON JAFARI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT C. BOBB, Individually, and in his Offi- cial Capacity as City Manager; JERRY JOHNSON, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as Deputy City Manager; JEFFREY WOODSON, Indi- vidually, and in his Official Capacity as Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Facilities, Defendants - Appellees, and CITY OF RICHMOND, Municipal Corporation; JOHN A. RUPP, Individually, and in his Official Ca- pacity as City Attorney; L. CHESTER BRAZZELL, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as Director of Personnel; L. ANGEL JONES, Indi- vidually, and in her Official Capacity as Deputy Director of Parks, Recreation, and Community Facilities, Defendants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-419-3) Submitted: April 20, 1999 Decided: July 13, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emmett Johnson Jafari, Appellant Pro Se. Beverly Agee Burton, Assistant City Attorney Keith Allen May, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Emmett Johnson Jafari appeals two district court orders, the first order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, denying his motion for entry of default judgment, and dismissing his sexual discrimination claims under Title VII for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and the second order granting Defendants Bobb’s, Woodson’s, and Johnson’s motions to dismiss and denying Jafari’s motion for entry of default judgment against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jafari v. City of Richmond, No. CA-98-419-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1998 and Jan. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3