UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1315
MICHAEL D. WILKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CYNTHIA S. WILKINS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-98-136-3, BK-95-33189-T, AP-95-3151-T)
Submitted: July 22, 1999 Decided: July 28, 1999
Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael D. Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. Neal Orion Reid, BANKRUPTCY
LEGAL CLINIC OF RICHMOND, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Michael D. Wilkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court. We dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Wilkins’ notice of appeal
was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the dis-
trict court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed.
R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal
period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period
under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory
and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections,
434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361
U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on Janu-
ary 28, 1999. Wilkins’ notice of appeal was filed on March 2,
1999. Because Wilkins failed to file a timely notice of appeal or
to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Wilkins v. Wilkins
Combined Opinion