Dunlap v. Attorney General NC

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6270 LARRY DAVIS DUNLAP, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA; G. L. WOODARD, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-192-1) Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: September 24, 1999 Before ERVIN,* NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Davis Dunlap, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. * Judge Ervin participated in the consideration of this case but died prior to the time the decision was filed. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Larry Davis Dunlap seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Dunlap v. Attorney General of North Caro- lina, No. CA-98-192-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 10, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2