UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1757
In Re: MUZIO ROBERTO and MARY K. ROBERTO,
Debtors.
_________________________
MUZIO B. ROBERTO; MARY K. ROBERTO,
Debtors - Appellants,
versus
JOSEPH NAPOLI; MARION NAPOLI,
Creditors - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-98-4097-AW, BK-98-12440-PM, 98-A1445-PM, CA-99-35-AW)
Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 8, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Muzio B. Roberto, Mary K. Roberto, Appellants Pro Se. Matthew
Wilson Black, Jr., HEENEY, ARMSTRONG & HEENEY, Rockville, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Muzio and Mary Roberto appeal from the district court’s order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing their complaint
to recover $102,000. Because the Robertos seek to set aside a
state court judgment, the bankruptcy court properly dismissed the
claim under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. See Rooker v. Fidelity
Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923); District of Columbia Court of
Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983). Accordingly, we affirm.
We deny the motions for sanctions and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2