UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-4029
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ERNEST EARL MCLAMB; THOMAS LATTIE MCLAMB,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, District
Judge. (CR-98-62-F)
Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 15, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Arthur Webb, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon,
Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina; J.
Michael McGuinness, Elizabethtown, North Carolina, for Appellants.
Janice McKenzie Cole, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, J. Frank Bradsher, Assistant United
States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Lattie McLamb and Ernest Earl McLamb each pled guilty
under separate plea agreements, to conspiracy to distribute and
possess with intent to distribute marijuana and to use of real and
personal property to facilitate and commit controlled substance
offenses. On appeal, their sole allegation is that the Government
breached its plea agreement with each of them by failing to fully
disclose to the sentencing court the scope of their cooperation
with the Government. We have reviewed the record and find no plain
error. See United States v. McQueen, 108 F.3d 64, 65-66 (4th Cir.
1997) (holding that when the issue of a breached plea agreement is
raised for first time on appeal, it is reviewed for plain error).
Accordingly, we affirm the McLambs’ convictions and sentences. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2