The defendant, acting pro se, has appealed from the entry of a Family Court order modifying his child suppot order. However, the proper procedure to seek review of a decree or order relating to the modification of child support is to petition this court for a writ of certiorari pursuant to G.L. 1956 (2000 Reenactment) § 14-1-52(b). We have "consistently held that questions involving the modification of child support are not reviewable by direct appeal." McKenna v. Guglietto, 683 A.2d 369, 369 (R.I. 1996)(mem.) (citing Almeida v. Almeida, 665 A.2d 696 (R.I. 1995) (mem.); Lentz v. Lentz, 651 A.2d 1242 (R.I. 1994); Cok v. Cok, 558 A.2d 205 *Page 1065 (R.I. 1989)(mem.)). Moreover, in McKenna, we took the "opportunity to pronounce that in the future we will consider only those matters that are properly before us, pursuant to § 14-1-52(b) and, only in the rarest of circumstances, will we allow deviation from the required procedure." 683 A.2d at 369. This case is not one that requires us to deviate from that rule.
For these reasons, we deny and dismiss the defendant's appeal, the order is affirmed, and the papers is this case are remanded to the Family Court.