Ayers v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Court: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date filed: 1894-12-05
Citations: 39 A. 1021, 68 N.H. 208
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion

It would serve no useful purpose to comment upon evidence such as appears in this case.

The defendants' motions and requests were properly denied. Lyman v. Railroad, 66 N.H. 200, 204; Foss v. Railroad, 66 N.H. 256, 260; Felch v. Railroad, 66 N.H. 318, 320, 322, 323; Boothby v. Railway, 66 N.H. 342; Walker v. Railroad, 64 N.H. 414; Paine v. Railway, 63 N.H. 623; Merrill v. Express Co., 62 N.H. 514; Nutter v. Railroad, 60 N.H. 483, 485; Tuttle v. Farmington, *Page 209 58 N.H. 13, 14; Griffin v. Auburn, 58 N.H. 121, 134; Paine v. Railway,58 N.H. 611; Gilman v. Noyes, 57 N.H. 627; Sleeper v. Sandown, 52 N.H. 244; Cheshire Railroad v. Foster, 51 N.H. 490, 493; Page v. Parker, 43 N.H. 363; Palmer v. Portsmouth, 43 N.H. 365.

Exceptions overruled.

WALLACE, J., did not sit: the others concurred.