Legal Research AI

Beach Exploration, Inc. v. Bradford L. Moore and McGowan & McGowan, P.C.

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date filed: 2002-02-25
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases

NO. 07-01-0086-CV


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS



FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



AT AMARILLO



PANEL C



FEBRUARY 25, 2002



______________________________





BEACH EXPLORATION, INC., APPELLANT



V.



BRADFORD L. MOORE AND McGOWAN & McGOWAN, P.C., APPELLEES





_________________________________



FROM THE 121st DISTRICT COURT OF TERRY COUNTY;



NO. 15,345; HONORABLE MARVIN MARSHALL, JUDGE



_______________________________





Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

ON JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND TO ABATE

APPEAL
TO PERMIT INTERLOCUTORY ORDER TO BE MADE FINAL





By opinion dated February 13, 2002, this Court examined its jurisdiction to hear this appeal and after concluding that the February 6, 2001 summary judgment appealed from was interlocutory, the appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Citing Iacono v. Lyons, 6 S.W.3d 715 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.), by their joint motion, the parties acknowledge that the judgment signed February 6, 2001, is not final, and pursuant to Rule 27.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure they request that we withdraw our opinion and judgment of February 13, 2002, and abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court so that a final judgment may be rendered.

Concluding that the motion should be granted, we hereby withdraw our opinion and judgment of February 13, 2002, and abate the appeal until Friday, April 26, 2002, and remand the cause to the trial court so that the jurisdictional defect can be cured. Upon rendition of a final judgment, a supplemental clerk's record containing the final order should be prepared and filed not later than April 26, 2002. If a supplemental clerk's record is not filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before April 26, 2002, the appeal will be subject to dismissal without further notice for the reasons explained in our opinion of February 13, 2002.

It is so ordered.

Don H. Reavis

Justice



Do not publish.

lant's counsel has moved for leave to withdraw. See Johnson v. State, 885 S.W.2d 641, 645 (Tex.App.-Waco 1994, writ ref'd). We carried the motion for consideration with the merits of the appeal. Having done so and finding no reversible error, appellant's counsel's motion to withdraw is granted and the trial court's judgment is affirmed.



Mackey K. Hancock

Justice





Do not publish.