Although the policy issued by Northern was prior to the date of the policy issued by Union Marine, the latter policy was the specific one, insuring, as it did, against a specific peril. The court below, therefore, correctly followed the declaration of the Court of Appeals that insurance may be specific because it insures against a specific peril. (Davis Yarn Co. v. Brooklyn Yarn Dye Co., 293 N. Y. 236.)
The orders appealed from were properly made.
The judgment and orders should be affirmed, with $10 costs.
Eder, Heoht and Tilzer, JJ., concur.
Judgment and orders affirmed, etc.