UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1500
BRETT KIMBERLIN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP; UNITED STATES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE;
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES; BERICO TECHNOLOGIES; MANTECH
INTERNATIONAL; HB GARY/FEDERAL; JOHN WOODS; RICHARD WYATT;
ROBERT QUACKENBOSS; GREG HOGLUND; AARON BARR; ALEX KARP;
MATT LONG; NICHOLAS HALLAM; MATTHEW STECKMAN; PAT RYAN; SAM
KREMIN; JOHN DOE Chamber of Commerce Employees; PACIFIC
NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY; WILLIAM HOGE; STRATIO
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, LLC; BILL NICKLESS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. George J. Hazel, District Judge.
(8:15-cv-00723-GJH)
Submitted: November 30, 2016 Decided: December 7, 2016
Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brett Kimberlin, Appellant Pro Se. Barrett James Anderson, John
J. Buckley, Jr., Craig Darren Singer, WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY, LLP,
Washington, D.C.; Bobby Roy Burchfield, Nicholas Andrew Oldham,
Johnny H. Walker, KING & SPALDING, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Allen
M. Gardner, Alexandra P. Shechtel, Jonathan C. Su, LATHAM &
WATKINS, Washington, D.C.; Sara A. Solow, LATHAM & WATKINS, New
York, New York; Attison Leonard Barnes, III, Mark B. Sweet,
Jennifer Stacey Zucker, WILEY REIN, LLP, Washington, D.C.;
Daniel Jack Blum, Glenn Marshal Cooper, Patricia Maureen Weaver,
PALEY, ROTHMAN & COOPER CHARTERED, Bethesda, Maryland; Kenneth
Bernard Weckstein, BROWN RUDNICK, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Mark
Nelson Bartlett, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP, Seattle, Washington;
Lisa Beth Zycherman, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP, Washington,
D.C.; Aaron Justin Walker, Manassas, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Brett Kimberlin appeals the district court’s order granting
the motions to dismiss his civil complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kimberlin v.
Hunton & Williams LLP, No. 8:15-cv-00723-GJH (D. Md. Mar. 29,
2016). We deny Kimberlin’s motion to show cause. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Brett Kimberlin v. Hunton & Williams
Combined Opinion