Bruce Fulmer v. Scott Klein

Case: 12-10416 Document: 00512726428 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/07/2014

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit

FILED
No. 12-10416 August 7, 2014
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
RANDY KOPP, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiff-Appellant

SCOTT W. KLEIN; DONALD B. REED; STEPHEN L. ROBERTSON;
THOMAS S. ROGERS; PAUL E. WEAVER; JOHN J. MUELLER; JERRY V.
ELLIOT; SAMUEL D. JONES; KATHERINE J. HARLESS; THE
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE; GEORGIA SCAIFE; JOHN DOES 1-
20; WILLIAM GIST; STEVEN GABERICH; CLIFFORD WILSON; BILLY
MUNDY; ANDREW COTICCHIO; THE HUMAN RESOURCES
COMMITTEE; FRANK P. GATTO,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas

ON REMAND FROM
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Randy Kopp, an employee of Idearc, Inc., and a participant in the Idearc
Management Plan (“the Plan”), brought this Employee Retirement Security
Act (“ERISA”) action on behalf of all current and former participants in the
Plan for whose individual accounts the Plan purchased or held shares of the
Idearc Stock Fund from November 21, 2006 through March 31, 2009. The
Case: 12-10416 Document: 00512726428 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/07/2014

No. 12-10416
district court dismissed Kopp’s complaint under Rule 12(b)(6). Fulmer v. Klein,
No. 3:09-CV-2354-N, 2012 WL 7634148 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 15, 2012). In an earlier
opinion, we affirmed. Kopp v. Klein, 722 F.3d 327 (5th Cir. 2013). The Supreme
Court granted a writ of certiorari, vacated our judgment, and remanded the
case “for further consideration in light of Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer,
573 U.S. ___ (2014).”
We VACATE the judgment of the Northern District of Texas, and
REMAND for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. 1

1Plaintiff-Appellant’s motion to remand and Defendants-Appellees’ cross-motion for
supplemental briefing are denied as moot.
2