Legal Research AI

Corbitt v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date filed: 2010-03-10
Citations: 598 F.3d 1259
Copy Citations
40 Citing Cases

                                                                              [PUBLISH]


                     IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                              FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT                   FILED
                                                                U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                  ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                      MAR 10, 2010
                                                                       JOHN LEY
                                        No. 08-12199                     CLERK

                           (D.C. Docket No. 06-00860-CV-CG-M)

DAVID W. CORBITT,
ALEXANDER J. RAYA, JR.,

                                                                       Plaintiff-Appellants,

versus

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.,

                                                                       Defendant-Appellee.

                                  ---------------------------
                   On Appeal from the United States District Court for the
                               Southern District of Alabama
                                  --------------------------

                 (Opinion December 4, 2009, 589 F.3d 1136, 11th Cir. 2009)

                                      (March 10, 2010)


Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, BLACK, CARNES,
BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.


BY THE COURT:

             A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this

case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this Court

in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

             IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The

previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.