Corr v. Shultz

Court: Indiana Supreme Court
Date filed: 2002-05-08
Citations: 767 N.E.2d 541, 767 N.E.2d 541, 767 N.E.2d 541
Copy Citations
4 Citing Cases

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT

Michael J. Anderson
Bernard E. Edwards, Jr.
South Bend, Indiana


ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES

Sean E. Kenyon
Robert J. Konopa
South Bend, Indiana
__________________________________________________________________


                                   IN THE



                          SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA

__________________________________________________________________

JAMES T. CORR,                    )
                                  )
      Appellant (Plaintiff Below), )    Indiana Supreme Court
                                  )     Cause No. 71S03-0107-CV-333
            v.                    )
                                  )     Indiana Court of Appeals
GLENN SHULTZ and             )    Cause No. 71A03-0006-CV-217
GLENN SHULTZ AGENCY, INC.,   )
                                  )
      Appellees (Defendants Below).     )
__________________________________________________________________

                  APPEAL FROM THE ST. JOSEPH SUPERIOR COURT
                   The Honorable William C. Whitman, Judge
                         Cause No. 71D09-9906-CT-171
__________________________________________________________________


                          ON PETITION FOR TRANSFER

__________________________________________________________________

                                 May 8, 2002

BOEHM, Justice.
      The Court of Appeals reversed  the  trial  court’s  grant  of  summary
judgment in favor of defendant Glenn Shultz.  Corr  v.  Shultz,  743  N.E.2d
1194 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001).  This Court granted transfer.
      In a companion case today, Corr v. Am. Family Ins., __ N.E.2d __ (Ind.
2002), we hold that a vehicle is an “underinsured  motor  vehicle”  pursuant
to Indiana Code section 27-7-5-4(b) if the  amount  actually  available  for
payment to  the  insured  from  the  tortfeasor’s  bodily  injury  liability
policies is less than  the  policy  limits  of  the  insured’s  underinsured
motorist coverage.  For the reasons given in that  opinion,  we  agree  with
the Court of Appeals in this case and reverse the  trial  court  and  remand
for proceedings consistent with this opinion and the opinion in Corr v.  Am.
Family Ins..


      SHEPARD, C.J., and DICKSON, SULLIVAN, and RUCKER, JJ., concur.

Boost your productivity today

Delegate legal research to Cetient AI. Ask AI to search, read, and cite cases and statutes.