Understand the law with legal research AI

Corwein v. Hames

Court: New York Supreme Court
Date filed: 1814-01-15
Citations: 11 Johns. 76
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion
Per Curiam.

The interest of the justice was too remote and contingent to be regarded in this case. The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.(a)

(a).

1 Johns. Rep. 486.

Understand legal concepts and procedures, draft documents, and conduct in-depth analysis.

No signup required.