NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
DRAGON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC,
Appellant
v.
UNIFIED PATENTS, INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2016-1813
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-
01252.
______________________
Decided: November 1, 2017
______________________
LEI MEI, Mei & Mark LLP, Washington, DC, argued
for appellant. Also represented by LAURENCE M.
SANDELL.
MICHAEL KIKLIS, Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neu-
stadt, LLP, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also
represented by LISA MANDRUSIAK, CHRISTOPHER RICCIUTI;
JONATHAN RUDOLPH KOMINEK STROUD, Unified Patents
Inc., Washington, DC.
______________________
2 DRAGON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY v. UNIFIED PATENTS, INC.
Before MOORE, MAYER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
STOLL, Circuit Judge.
Dragon Intellectual Property appeals the Patent Trial
and Appeal Board’s determination that claims 1, 2, 7, 8,
10, 13, and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 5,930,444 are invalid.
Our decision today in a related case, Dragon Intellectual
Property, LLC v. DISH Network LLC et al., Nos. 2016-
2468, -2492, affirms the Board’s determination that
claims 1–4, 7–10, 13, and 14 of the ’444 patent are inva-
lid. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as moot.
DISMISSED AS MOOT
COSTS
No costs.
Dragon Intellectual Property v. Unified Patents, Inc.
Combined Opinion