Drew v. Northwestern Corp.

Court: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date filed: 1929-03-07
Citations: 133 Misc. 706, 233 N.Y.S. 292, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 683
Copy Citations
2 Citing Cases
Lead Opinion
Per Curiam.

Service of the summons in this case on the foreign corporate defendant was made by delivery thereof to the person in whose possession property of the defendant was found available for attachment. Section 48 of the Municipal Court Code, in so

Page 707
far as it authorizes such service upon a non-resident defendant, is unconstitutional. (Nerenberg v. Keith, 101 Misc. 551.) The fact that tangible property was levied on by the marshal would not change the situation. The test of the constitutionality of the statute is what might be done under its terms, not what was done in a particular case. , ***

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Lydon, Callahan and Peters, JJ.