Galligan v. Heath

Per Curiam,

The learned court below could not have directed a verdict for the plaintiff, as requested by his first and second points. The question of fact for the jury, under the evidence, was as to the amount he was entitled to recover on his mortgage, and, as that has been established by the verdict, the judgment on it is affirmed.

Boost your productivity today

Delegate legal research to Cetient AI. Ask AI to search, read, and cite cases and statutes.