Hartman v. Hartman

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date filed: 1908-11-16
Citations: 74 N.J. Eq. 851, 71 A. 417, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 286
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion
Per Curiam.

This case involves only questions of fact. We agree with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor. The decree under review should therefore be affirmed.

The application for counsel fee is denied.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reep, Trencharp, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees,-Minturn, Bogert, Vrepenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill —16.
For reversal — None.