_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
On September 4, 2007, in the above cause, relator, David Andrew Douglas, filed a document titled "Notice and Demand Commercial Offer with Affidavit in Support" which we construe as a petition for writ of mandamus. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition, its attachments including an affidavit of default and stipulation commercial offer commercial law notice, an affidavit re[garding] denial of notary service, and an affidavit of service, as well as documents filed on November 13, 2007, including a commercial affidavit and two first notices of debt, and is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 29th day of November, 2007.
1.
See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).