NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE: NUVASIVE, INC.,
Appellant
______________________
2015-1839, 2015-1840
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos.
IPR2014-00073, IPR2014-00074.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich &
Rosati, PC, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. Also repre-
sented by ANDREW SWANSON BROWN, SONJA ROCHELLE
GERRARD; GRACE J. PAK, PAUL DAVID TRIPODI, II, Los
Angeles, CA; RICHARD TORCZON, Washington, DC.
SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA,
argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented
by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH
MATAL, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 10, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
In Re: Nuvasive, Inc.
Combined Opinion