Legal Research AI

in Re Ruby v. Ludwig

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date filed: 2004-11-18
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN






NO. 03-04-00464-CV

NO. 03-04-00466-CV


In re Ruby V. Ludwig

&

In re Joy Higdon






ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS FROM TRAVIS COUNTY


O R D E R





The attorneys ad litem for the children have filed a motion for rehearing with this Court. The motion is overruled. However, we note that our opinion stated that the writ would issue only in the event that the trial court did not (1) vacate its order terminating Higdon's parent child relationship and (2) dismiss the department's SAPCR. Relator Ludwig's intervention is unaffected by the trial court's dismissal of the department's SAPCR. See In re Bishop, 8 S.W.3d 412, 420 (Tex. App.--Waco 1999, pet. denied) (section 263.401 only requires dismissal of department's suit). All issues concerning conservatorship and possession of the children remain pending in the trial court.

It is ORDERED this 18th day of November 2004.





Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear